This report presents the results of Coresight Research’s latest weekly survey of US consumers, undertaken on March 1. The report includes analysis of new questions on shopper behaviors and the impacts of the coronavirus outbreak. We explore the trends we are seeing from week to week, following previous weekly surveys.
What Consumers Bought In-Store and Online
This week, we saw slight increases in purchases of essentials after a decline last week. Online purchases rebounded for a few discretionary categories, after falling last week.
Figure 1. All Respondents: What They Have Bought In-Store and Online in the Past Two Weeks (% of Respondents)
[caption id="attachment_124235" align="aligncenter" width="700"] Respondents could select multiple optionsWhich Retailers Consumers Purchased Food and Nonfood Products From
Since December 21, 2020, we have asked consumers which retailers they bought from in the two-week period preceding the survey, for both food and nonfood products.
For food purchases:
For nonfood purchases:
Figure 2. All Respondents: Which Retailers They Have Bought Food Products From and Which Retailers They Have Bought Nonfood Products From in the Past Two Weeks (% of Respondents)
[caption id="attachment_124236" align="aligncenter" width="700"] Respondents could select multiple optionsConsumers Getting a Haircut or Grooming Service Reaches New High
Complementing our questions about purchases in the past two weeks, each week, we ask consumers what activities they have done in the past two weeks. This week, the proportion of respondents rose for half of the twelve activities we asked about.
Figure 3. All Respondents: What Activities They Have Done in the Past Two Weeks (% of Respondents)
[caption id="attachment_124237" align="aligncenter" width="700"] Respondents could select multiple optionsAlmost Eight in 10 Are Avoiding Public Places
This week, the avoidance rate of any type of public area came in at 79.3%, broadly level with last week. For 10 of the 13 location options provided, rates of avoidance increased this week, although some changes were within the margin of error.
What Consumers Are Currently Buying More Of and Less Of
The proportion of consumers buying more of any product due to the coronavirus crisis has been declining in recent weeks, although it remains at an elevated level compared to January. This week, 62.1% of consumers reported purchasing more of any product and those buying less of any product for the same reason increased slightly to 50.4%.
Buying more:
This week, fewer consumers reported that they are buying more for eight of the 13 category options. Essentials remained the most-purchased categories, although all except food witnessed week-over-week declines. Personal care saw the largest drop, of 10 percentage points.
For discretionary products, the proportion of consumers buying more books and music (including streaming and downloads) reached the highest level this year, at 23.7%. Beauty, clothing and footwear, and electronics all saw slight week-over-week declines.
The upward trend in consumers buying more sports or workout equipment is notable. Some 11.7% are buying more in such category—the highest proportion we have recorded this year, despite the week-over-week decline in the proportion of consumers that reported buying sports or workout equipment, as shown in Figure 1. Broken down by age group, the youngest consumer group are driving the purchases, with almost three in 10 buying more sports or workout equipment this week, as shown in Figure 6. We also saw an upward trend among Gen Z consumers (those aged 45–60), which could be fueled by their increasing interest in leading a healthy lifestyle.
Buying less:
The proportion of consumers making fewer discretionary purchases remained relatively high this week: Almost 30% are buying less in clothing and footwear than pre-crisis, down from 24.1% last week. This level is roughly the same as what our survey recorded in January. Other categories including electronics, home and toys all saw week-over-week improvements in purchases, although the changes were within the margin of error.
Ratio of less to more: The ratios of the proportion of respondents buying less to the proportion buying more fell in seven of the 13 options we surveyed this week, mostly in discretionary categories.
Figure 5. All Respondents: What They Are Currently Buying More/Less Of Due to the Coronavirus Outbreak (% of Respondents)
[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="700"] Base: US respondents aged 18+Figure 6. All Respondents: Proportions of Respondents That Are Buying More Sports or Workout Equipment Than They Used To, by Age Group (% Of Respondents)
[caption id="attachment_124240" align="aligncenter" width="550"] Base: US respondents aged 18+In recent weeks, we have seen fluctuations in multiple metrics, but long-term trends still suggest that consumers are becoming more comfortable in returning to normal activities. Discretionary purchases have improved compared to the beginning of the year, but categories such as apparel remain weak.
On February 27, the US House of Representatives passed a third round of stimulus checks of up to $1,400 per person. At the time of writing, the Senate has not yet voted on the third stimulus checks, but if it passes in the Senate, consumers could receive the stimulus as early as the weekend of March 6. The third stimulus check may help to lift consumers’ discretionary spending in later weeks, although to a limited extent, as consumers appear to be prioritizing stimulus checks on essential spending, according to our February 8 survey.
Our recurring weekly questions indicated the following:
We surveyed respondents online on March 1 (401 respondents), February 22 (402 respondents), February 15 (401 respondents), February 8 (405 respondents), February 1 (449 respondents), January 25 (419 respondents), January 18 (415 respondents), January 11 (416 respondents), January 4 (439 respondents), December 28 (416 respondents), December 21 (416 respondents), December 15 (438 respondents), December 8 (463 respondents), December 1 (441 respondents), November 24 (460 respondents), November 17 (425 respondents), November 10 (447 respondents), November 3 (418 respondents), October 27 (419 respondents), October 20 (409 respondents), October 13 (401 respondents), October 6 (416 respondents), September 29 (412 respondents), September 22 (422 respondents), September 15 (408 respondents), September 9 (406 respondents), September 2 (402 respondents), August 26 (414 respondents), August 19 (416 respondents), August 12 (400 respondents), August 5 (449 respondents), July 29 (403 respondents), July 22 (404 respondents), July 15 (454 respondents), July 8 (410 respondents), July 1 (444 respondents), June 24 (411 respondents), June 17 (432 respondents), June 10 (423 respondents), June 3 (464 respondents), May 27 (422 respondents), May 20 (439 respondents), May 13 (431 respondents), May 6 (446 respondents), April 29 (479 respondents), April 22 (418 respondents), April 15 (410 respondents), April 8 (450 respondents), April 1 (477 respondents), March 25 (495 respondents) and March 17–18 (1,152 respondents). The results have a margin of error of +/- 5%, with a 95% confidence interval. Not all charted week-over-week differences may be statistically significant.