This report presents the results of Coresight Research’s latest weekly survey of US consumers, undertaken on February 1. The report includes analysis of new questions on shopper behaviors and the impacts of the coronavirus outbreak. We explore the trends we are seeing from week to week, following previous weekly surveys.
What Consumers Bought In-Store and Online
We saw week-over-week decreases in in-store shopping for some essential categories, while most discretionary purchases still took place online.
Figure 1. All Respondents: What They Have Bought In-Store and Online in the Past Two Weeks (% of Respondents)
[caption id="attachment_122925" align="aligncenter" width="700"] Respondents could select multiple optionsWhich Retailers Consumers Purchased Food and Nonfood Products From
Since December 21, 2020, we have asked consumers which retailers they bought from in the two-week period preceding the survey, for both food and nonfood products.
The proportion of consumers shopping for both food and nonfood products remained fairly stable week over week, with all changes within the margin of error.
For food purchases:
For nonfood purchases:
More Consumers Are Comfortable Returning to Some Regular Activities
Complementing our questions about purchases in the past two weeks, each week, we ask consumers what activities they have done in the past two weeks. This week, the proportion of respondents broadly leveled off for half of the options we provided for recent activities.
Figure 3. All Respondents: What Activities They Have Done in the Past Two Weeks (% of Respondents)
[caption id="attachment_122927" align="aligncenter" width="700"] Respondents could select multiple optionsOver Eight in 10 Are Currently Avoiding Public Places
In this week’s survey, the avoidance rate of any type of public area stood at 83.5%, versus 81.9% last week and 80.7% two weeks ago. Despite the slight increase in overall avoidance, avoidance rates were down week over week in seven of the 13 options provided.
Figure 4. All Respondents: Public Places That Respondents Are Currently Avoiding (% of Respondents)
[caption id="attachment_122928" align="aligncenter" width="700"] Respondents could select multiple optionsWhat Consumers Are Currently Buying More Of and Less Of
The proportion of consumers buying more of any product due to the pandemic decreased by six percentage points, from 44.6% to 43.4%. The proportion of consumers buying less of any product also dipped slightly this week, to 45.2%. This is the first time since September 2020 that the proportion buying more is below those buying less due to the pandemic.
Buying more: The week-over-week decline in the proportion of consumers that are buying more overall was due to a lower proportion in those buying more essentials, including health, household and personal care products. Household and personal care products both decreased week over week by roughly five percentage points.
Buying less: The proportion of consumers buying less discretionary categories remained relatively high this week: Some 29.6% are buying less clothing and footwear, broadly leveled from last week. Some 19.2% are buying fewer beauty products and 13.6% are buying less in home categories.
Ratio of less to more: The ratios of the proportion of respondents buying less to the proportion buying more fell in all of the discretionary categories except beauty this week:
Figure 5. All Respondents: What They Are Currently Buying More/Less Of Due to the Coronavirus Outbreak (% of Respondents)
[caption id="attachment_122929" align="aligncenter" width="700"] Base: US respondents aged 18+Fewer Than Half Expect To Retain Changed Behaviors in the Long Term
We asked respondents whether they think they will keep some of the behaviors they have adopted during the coronavirus crisis in the long term. This week, some 44.8% of respondents expect to retain some changed behaviors, the lowest level since we started asking this question in late March, implying that consumers may be more willing to return to their regular activities than previously expected.
Figure 6. All Respondents: Expectation To Behave Differently/Retain Changed Way of Living in the Long Term (% of Respondents)
[caption id="attachment_122930" align="aligncenter" width="700"] Question not asked every weekFor 10 of the 11 behavior options provided, the proportions of respondents declined this week in comparison to the last time we asked the question on December 15, 2020. Most changes were within the margin of error.
Surprisingly, using contactless payment options in store more often witnessed the largest decrease, of 10 percentage points from last time we asked the question, to only 10.2%—the lowest level we have seen. In our Retail 2021: Global Trends report, we predict sustained growth in demand and uptake in digital payment in 2021.
Having more hygienic practices is the only behavior that increased in proportion, compared to last time we asked the question. Some 28.7% expect to retain this behavior in the long term, versus one-quarter on December 15, 2020. It also returned as the top behavior that respondents expect to retain after the crisis.
The proportion of respondents expecting to have fewer physical interactions and wear masks in public in the long term both dropped to record lows.
Figure 7. All Respondents: What Changed Behaviors They Expect To Retain (% of Respondents)
[caption id="attachment_122931" align="aligncenter" width="700"] Respondents could select multiple optionsIn the chart below, we show trended data in three of the metrics charted above. The medium-term trends suggest increasing intentions to return to more normal ways of living and shopping, with all three metrics appearing to be past their peak and trending downward:
Figure 8. All Respondents: Selected Behaviors They Expect To Retain (% of Respondents)
[caption id="attachment_122932" align="aligncenter" width="700"] Question not asked every weekAs Covid-19 cases in the US have edged downward since the beginning of January, this week we saw a slight increase in consumers becoming more comfortable returning to their regular activities, such as dining in restaurants and going to gyms, despite the still-high avoidance rate of public places. On the other hand, after a solid holiday season for US retail, there is still a long way ahead for consumers’ discretionary purchases to revert to pre-pandemic levels.
The return to normalcy in the US will largely depend on the speed of the vaccine rollout nationwide. According to Bloomberg, 33.7 million doses have been given in the US as of February 3, which falls short of federal projections. The Biden administration announced a new program that will deliver some doses directly from government to retail pharmacies beginning February 11 to accelerate vaccination. Companies including CVS, Kroger, Walgreens and Kroger said that they are prepared to vaccinate tens of millions of people per month. This joint effort could help to step up the pace of vaccinations, and we may see a more sustained recovery in consumer shopping and spending behavior in the next few months.
Our recurring weekly questions indicated the following:
We surveyed respondents online on February 1 (449 respondents), January 25 (419 respondents), January 18 (415 respondents), January 11 (416 respondents), January 4 (439 respondents), December 28 (416 respondents), December 21 (416 respondents), December 15 (438 respondents), December 8 (463 respondents), December 1 (441 respondents), November 24 (460 respondents), November 17 (425 respondents), November 10 (447 respondents), November 3 (418 respondents), October 27 (419 respondents), October 20 (409 respondents), October 13 (401 respondents), October 6 (416 respondents), September 29 (412 respondents), September 22 (422 respondents), September 15 (408 respondents), September 9 (406 respondents), September 2 (402 respondents), August 26 (414 respondents), August 19 (416 respondents), August 12 (400 respondents), August 5 (449 respondents), July 29 (403 respondents), July 22 (404 respondents), July 15 (454 respondents), July 8 (410 respondents), July 1 (444 respondents), June 24 (411 respondents), June 17 (432 respondents), June 10 (423 respondents), June 3 (464 respondents), May 27 (422 respondents), May 20 (439 respondents), May 13 (431 respondents), May 6 (446 respondents), April 29 (479 respondents), April 22 (418 respondents), April 15 (410 respondents), April 8 (450 respondents), April 1 (477 respondents), March 25 (495 respondents) and March 17–18 (1,152 respondents). The results have a margin of error of +/- 5%, with a 95% confidence interval. Not all charted week-over-week differences may be statistically significant.